Skip to Main Content
Menu
n
a
v
Main navigation
Home
Network Resources
About the Database
Available Statistical Support
Available Specimens
About the Study
Background
Specific Aims
Study Design
Summary of Findings
CALERIE Contacts
Database Documentation
Guide to Using the Public Database
Data Contents
Data Handling Rules
Forms
Table of Available Measures
Biorepository
Apply for Samples & Data Analysis
Samples & Data Access and Analysis
Apply for Pilot Study
CTS Intervention Database
Protocols & Procedures
Ongoing Projects
Publications
Events
Duke University School of Medicine
Quick Navigation
About the Study
Network Resources
Database Documentation
Biorepository
2024 Pilot Funds
Protocols & Procedures
Ongoing Projects
Publications
Events
Funding Opportunities
NIH Analyses of CALERIE Datasets and Biospecimens Grants
Duke Aging Center NIA T32 Postdoctoral Research Training Program
Pennington Biomedical T32 - Postdoctoral Training in Obesity Research
NIA R21 and R01 Opportunities
Calerie Centers
Breadcrumb
Home
Publications
Does Exclusion of Extreme Reporters of Energy Intake (the "Goldberg Cutoffs") Reliably Reduce or Eliminate Bias In Nutrition Studies? Analysis With Illustrative Associations of Energy Intake With Health Outcomes.
Does exclusion of extreme reporters of energy intake (the "Goldberg cutoffs") reliably reduce or eliminate bias in nutrition studies? Analysis with illustrative associations of energy intake with health outcomes.
